2007 Regular Session


File Code: Family Law
Sponsored By:
Delegates Impallaria, Boteler, Costa, Elmore, Kach, J. King, Kipke, McDonough, Shewell, Smigiel, and Sossi
Family Law - Marriage - Definition and Benefits


Establishing that a specified benefit provider that provides a benefit plan to a married couple is not required to provide that benefit plan to a nonmarried couple and may establish a rate for a benefit plan for a married couple that differs from the rate for a benefit plan for a nonmarried couple; etc.

History by Legislative and Calendar Date

House Action
First Reading Judiciary
Hearing 3/15 at 1:00 p.m.
Unfavorable Report by Judiciary
Senate Action
No Action

Sponsored by:

Delegate Rick Impallaria, District 7
Delegate Joseph C. Boteler, III, District 8
Delegate Robert A. Costa, District 33B
Delegate D. Page Elmore, District 38A
Delegate Wade Kach, District 5
Delegate James S. King, District 33A
Delegate Nicholaus R. Kipke, District 31
Delegate Pat McDonough, District 7
Delegate Tanya Shewell, District 5A
Delegate Michael D. Smigiel, Sr., District 36
Delegate Richard A. Sossi, District 36

Bill indexed under the following Subjects:

Family Law -see also- Adoption; Annulment; Divorce; etc
Health Insurance -see also- HMOS; Managed Care Organizations
Insurance -see also- Health Ins; MAIF; Motor Vehicle Ins
Prices -see also- Consumer Price Index
Retirement Systems -see also- Mandatory Retirement
Work, Labor and Employment -see also- Col Barg; Holiday; etc

Bill affects the following Statutes:

Family Law
( 2-101 , 2-101.1 )


Bill Text (Displayed in PDF Format): First Reading, Third Reading, Enrolled
Fiscal and Policy Note (Displayed in PDF Format): Available
Amendments: None offered